Woodall v. Farmers Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Woodall v. Farmers Bank

137 S.E. 14, 163 Ga. 841, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 78

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 25, 1927·No. No. 5420·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

1. The court below did not err in construing the will to confer upon J. W. Woodall the power and authority to execute the deed containing the power of sale to the bank; but inasmuch as that was at an interlocutory hearing, this court does not now undertake to otherwise construe the will,' and leaves the proper construction thereof for determination upon final trial of the ease.

[842]*842No. 5420. February 25, 1927. Rehearing denied March 5, 1927. Reagan & Reagan and Cleveland é Goodrich, for plaintiff. JS. 0. Dobbs and Beck & Beck, for defendants.

2. The court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Mill, J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

1. The court below did not err in construing the will to confer upon J. W. Woodall the power and authority to execute the deed containing the power of sale to the bank; but inasmuch as that was at an interlocutory hearing, this court does not now undertake to otherwise construe the will,' and leaves the proper construction thereof for determination upon final trial of the ease.

[842]*842No. 5420. February 25, 1927. Rehearing denied March 5, 1927. Reagan & Reagan and Cleveland é Goodrich, for plaintiff. JS. 0. Dobbs and Beck & Beck, for defendants.

2. The court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Mill, J., absent because of illness.

Woodall v. Farmers Bank, 137 S.E. 14, 163 Ga. 841, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 78 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

137 S.E. 14 (Woodall v. Farmers Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.