Woodall v. Estabrook

Fourth Circuit

Woodall v. Estabrook

273 F. 152, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1434

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 1921

DocketNos. 1847, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 F. 152 (Woodall v. Estabrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodall v. Estabrook, 273 F. 152, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1434 (4th Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

These are suits in equity to have removed as a cloud on complainant’s title a paper described as a disclaimer. The instrument is the same in character as that we have considered and held to be in effect a quitclaim deed in the opinion just filed in the ejectment suit of Joseph D. Miller v. George L. Estabrook and others, 278 Fed. 144. AH the questions here made were involved in that case, and the decision in that case is conclusive of these.

The result is that the decrees of the District Court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

These are suits in equity to have removed as a cloud on complainant’s title a paper described as a disclaimer. The instrument is the same in character as that we have considered and held to be in effect a quitclaim deed in the opinion just filed in the ejectment suit of Joseph D. Miller v. George L. Estabrook and others, 278 Fed. 144. AH the questions here made were involved in that case, and the decision in that case is conclusive of these.

The result is that the decrees of the District Court must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 F. 152, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodall-v-estabrook-ca4-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack