Woodall v. Estabrook

Fourth Circuit

Woodall v. Estabrook

273 F. 152, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1434

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1921·No. Nos. 1847, 1848·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

These are suits in equity to have removed as a cloud on complainant’s title a paper described as a disclaimer. The instrument is the same in character as that we have considered and held to be in effect a quitclaim deed in the opinion just filed in the ejectment suit of Joseph D. Miller v. George L. Estabrook and others, 278 Fed. 144. AH the questions here made were involved in that case, and the decision in that case is conclusive of these.

The result is that the decrees of the District Court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

These are suits in equity to have removed as a cloud on complainant’s title a paper described as a disclaimer. The instrument is the same in character as that we have considered and held to be in effect a quitclaim deed in the opinion just filed in the ejectment suit of Joseph D. Miller v. George L. Estabrook and others, 278 Fed. 144. AH the questions here made were involved in that case, and the decision in that case is conclusive of these.

The result is that the decrees of the District Court must be affirmed.

Woodall v. Estabrook, 273 F. 152, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1434 (4th Cir. 1921).

Pincite

273 F. 152 (Woodall v. Estabrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related