Wood v. Yonge

9 Port. 208
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1839·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COLLIER, C- J.

The only question .made at the argib ment, is as to the correctness, of the judgment on demurrer. In Toulmin vs. Bennett & Laidlaw, (3 Stew. & Por. 225,) on a scire facias against bail, it was decided that it was competent for the bail to show by plea, that the plaintiff had not given security for costs — and by failing to do so, the bail bond was void. With this decision, We are satisfied ; and the judgment is consequently reversed, and the case remanded. • -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Yonge, 9 Port. 208 (Ala. 1839).

9 Port. 208 (Wood v. Yonge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Brien v. Lewis
8 Ala. 666 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)