Wood v. Yonge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Wood v. Yonge

9 Port. 208

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1839

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Port. 208 (Wood v. Yonge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Yonge, 9 Port. 208 (Ala. 1839).

Pincite

Opinion

COLLIER, C- J.

The only question .made at the argib ment, is as to the correctness, of the judgment on demurrer. In Toulmin vs. Bennett & Laidlaw, (3 Stew. & Por. 225,) on a scire facias against bail, it was decided that it was competent for the bail to show by plea, that the plaintiff had not given security for costs — and by failing to do so, the bail bond was void. With this decision, We are satisfied ; and the judgment is consequently reversed, and the case remanded. • -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COLLIER, C- J.

The only question .made at the argib ment, is as to the correctness, of the judgment on demurrer. In Toulmin vs. Bennett & Laidlaw, (3 Stew. & Por. 225,) on a scire facias against bail, it was decided that it was competent for the bail to show by plea, that the plaintiff had not given security for costs — and by failing to do so, the bail bond was void. With this decision, We are satisfied ; and the judgment is consequently reversed, and the case remanded. • -

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Port. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-yonge-ala-1839.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack