Wood v. Whittaker Corp.

519 So. 2d 1044, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 227, 1988 WL 4527
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 1988·No. No. 86-3061·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 515 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1987); Melendez v. Dreis & Krump Mfg. Co., 515 So.2d 735 (Fla.1987); Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc., 413 So.2d 1 (Fla.1982); Watson v. First Nat’l Bank, 367 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Willis v. L. W. Foster Sportswear Co., 352 So.2d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Movielab, Inc. v. Davis, 217 So.2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Whittaker Corp., 519 So. 2d 1044, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 227, 1988 WL 4527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

519 So. 2d 1044 (Wood v. Whittaker Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Movielab, Inc. v. Davis
217 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Melendez v. Dreis and Krump Mfg. Co.
515 So. 2d 735 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Pait v. Ford Motor Company
515 So. 2d 1278 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Willis v. LW Foster Sportswear Co., Inc.
352 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Watson v. First National Bank of Chicago
367 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)