Wood v. Westhusing

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wood v. Westhusing

468 S.W.3d 427, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 819, 2015 WL 4910539

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 18, 2015·No. WD 77545·Published

Opinion

[428] ORDER

Pei- Curiam

Mark Westhusing appeals from the circuit court’s judgment awarding Rebbeca Lake Wood, Personal Representative for the Estate of Brandy Rye, a money judgment for one-half the value of assets that Westhusing and Rye acquired during the 13 years that they lived together. Wes-thusing contends the circuit court erred in ruling that he and Rye had an implied in fact contract to share assets they acquired during their cohabitation and in denying his motion to dismiss Rye’s alternative claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[428] ORDER

Pei- Curiam

Mark Westhusing appeals from the circuit court’s judgment awarding Rebbeca Lake Wood, Personal Representative for the Estate of Brandy Rye, a money judgment for one-half the value of assets that Westhusing and Rye acquired during the 13 years that they lived together. Wes-thusing contends the circuit court erred in ruling that he and Rye had an implied in fact contract to share assets they acquired during their cohabitation and in denying his motion to dismiss Rye’s alternative claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Wood v. Westhusing, 468 S.W.3d 427, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 819, 2015 WL 4910539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

468 S.W.3d 427 (Wood v. Westhusing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.