Wood v. United States

389 U.S. 20, 88 S. Ct. 3, 19 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 501
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 16, 1967·No. 27 M·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner was found guilty by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia of refusing to report for civilian employment, in violation of § 12 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 62 Stat. 622, 50 U. S. C. App. § 462. Before trial he filed an affidavit with the court requesting assigned counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3006A. The court considered the affidavit, questioned petitioner and disapproved the request. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis, assigned counsel to assist petitioner in his appeal and affirmed the conviction. Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari.

Before this Court the Solicitor General has conceded that the record does not convincingly show that there *21 was adequate inquiry into the question of petitioner’s financial ability to retain counsel, in that “the trial court should have explored the possibility that petitioner could afford only partial payment for the services of trial counsel and that counsel be appointed on that basis, as the Criminal Justice Act permits (see 18 U. S. C. § 3006(A) (c) and (f)).” The Solicitor General urges, however, that there is no basis for believing that petitioner suffered prejudice from the District Court’s error, an argument we find unpersuasive.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General’s Memorandum and the relevant criteria of the Criminal Justice Act.

Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. United States, 389 U.S. 20, 88 S. Ct. 3, 19 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 501 (1967).

389 U.S. 20 (Wood v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Callahan
S.D. California, 2020
People v. Quintanilla
Superior Court of Guam, 2018
People v. Alengi
114 P.3d 883 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2005)
Kincade v. State
796 S.W.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
Potter v. State
547 A.2d 595 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1988)
United States v. Sidney Barcelon
833 F.2d 894 (Tenth Circuit, 1987)
Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright
602 F. Supp. 698 (S.D. Florida, 1985)
United States v. Gray Moore, Jr.
671 F.2d 139 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Enrique v. State
408 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
United States v. James K. Deutsch
599 F.2d 46 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Clark Bracewell
569 F.2d 1194 (Second Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Maurice Raymond Turcotte
487 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. John E. Kelly
467 F.2d 262 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Thorn
317 F. Supp. 389 (E.D. Louisiana, 1970)
Leo Anaya v. J. E. Baker, Warden
427 F.2d 73 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Bowen v. State
236 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
United States v. Robert J. Cohen
419 F.2d 1124 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Kenneth Wood
413 F.2d 437 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)