Wood v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
This text of 62 S.E. 97 (Wood v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An insufficient verification of a plea in abatement is a mere matter of form, and is an amendable defect; and if the plaintiff does not object to the verification of the plea before issue joined, it will be too late for him to do so thereafter. Civil Code, §5045; Ward v. Frick Company, 95 Ga. 804 (22 S. E. 899).
2. The better practice is to submit the issue of the plea in abatement before trying the merits of the case;, but where both issues are sub[672]*672mitted- together, and the verdict of the jury is restricted to the finding in favor of the plea in abatement, no harm is done, and the error is not reversible.
3. The evidence is sufficient to justify the verdict in favor of the plea in abatement. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 S.E. 97, 4 Ga. App. 671, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-gactapp-1908.