Wood v. Tanner

99 P. 123, 15 Idaho 689, 1909 Ida. LEXIS 4
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided January 21, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

STEWART, J.

In this ease the respondent recovered a judgment against the appellant for the sum of $1,200 for breach of the terms of a lease. The appellant moved for a new trial, which was denied by the trial court, and this appeal is from the order overruling the motion for a new trial.

In this court, respondent moves to strike the bill of exceptions from the transcript and to dismiss the appeal. The first motion must be sustained upon the authority of Buckle [691]*691v. McConaghy, 11 Ida. 533, 83 Pac. 525, which is followed and approved. The second motion must be sustained upon the authority of Smith v. American Falls Canal & Power Co., 15 Ida. 89, 95 Pac. 1059, which is followed and approved. The appeal, therefore, in this case is dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent.

(March 6, 1909.) [99 Pac. 1053.] Ailshie, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Tanner, 99 P. 123, 15 Idaho 689, 1909 Ida. LEXIS 4 (Idaho 1909).

99 P. 123 (Wood v. Tanner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Livingstone v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.
173 P. 1086 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1918)