Wood v. Tanner
This text of 99 P. 123 (Wood v. Tanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this ease the respondent recovered a judgment against the appellant for the sum of $1,200 for breach of the terms of a lease. The appellant moved for a new trial, which was denied by the trial court, and this appeal is from the order overruling the motion for a new trial.
In this court, respondent moves to strike the bill of exceptions from the transcript and to dismiss the appeal. The first motion must be sustained upon the authority of Buckle [691]*691v. McConaghy, 11 Ida. 533, 83 Pac. 525, which is followed and approved. The second motion must be sustained upon the authority of Smith v. American Falls Canal & Power Co., 15 Ida. 89, 95 Pac. 1059, which is followed and approved. The appeal, therefore, in this case is dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 P. 123, 15 Idaho 689, 1909 Ida. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-tanner-idaho-1909.