Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Wood v. Stuart

Wood v. Stuart

95 N.Y.S. 1166
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think the statement of items contained in the plaintiff’s bill of particulars constitutes an account of such a character as to justify a compulsory order of reference in this case. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Stuart, 95 N.Y.S. 1166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

95 N.Y.S. 1166 (Wood v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.