Wood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wood v. State

1915 OK CR 248, 151 P. 1198, 12 Okla. Crim. 604, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 246

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 2, 1915

DocketNo. A-2363.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 248 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. State, 1915 OK CR 248, 151 P. 1198, 12 Okla. Crim. 604, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 246 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J. R. Wood and Gidlow Wood were by information filed in the district court of Bryan county jointly charged with the crime of assault with intent to kill. A severance was granted, and each upon his separate trial was found guilty of assault and battery as included in the charge contained in the information. The punish *605 ment in each ease was fixed by tlie jury at a fine of fifty dollars. From the judgments entered on the verdicts they appealed by filing in this court on November 14, 1914, a duly certified transcript of the record in each ease. No briefs were filed, and when the ease was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiffs in error. Whereupon the Attorney General moved that the appeals from the judgments' rendered therein be dismissed. It appearing that the appeals herein have been abandoned the motion to dismiss the same is sustained and the cause remanded to the lower court with direction to enforce the judgments therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J. R. Wood and Gidlow Wood were by information filed in the district court of Bryan county jointly charged with the crime of assault with intent to kill. A severance was granted, and each upon his separate trial was found guilty of assault and battery as included in the charge contained in the information. The punish *605 ment in each ease was fixed by tlie jury at a fine of fifty dollars. From the judgments entered on the verdicts they appealed by filing in this court on November 14, 1914, a duly certified transcript of the record in each ease. No briefs were filed, and when the ease was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiffs in error. Whereupon the Attorney General moved that the appeals from the judgments' rendered therein be dismissed. It appearing that the appeals herein have been abandoned the motion to dismiss the same is sustained and the cause remanded to the lower court with direction to enforce the judgments therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 248, 151 P. 1198, 12 Okla. Crim. 604, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-oklacrimapp-1915.