Wood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wood v. State

800 S.W.2d 772, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 1990 WL 175728

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wood v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 600 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 1990·No. No. 58187·Published

Opinion

[773]*773ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[773]*773ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Wood v. State, 800 S.W.2d 772, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 1990 WL 175728 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

800 S.W.2d 772 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.