Wood v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Wood v. State

62 Miss. 220

DecidedOctober 15, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Miss. 220 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. State, 62 Miss. 220 (Mich. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no error in the record. The defendant contented himself in his examination of the jury with the very general question whether any of the jurors knew of any reason why they should hot sit in the trial of the case, and thereby precluded himself from urging, in a motion for a new trial, the incompetency of the juror as to any matter which the usual examination would have disclosed. Gregg v. The State, 39 Miss. 570; Brown v. The State, 60 Miss. 447.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no error in the record. The defendant contented himself in his examination of the jury with the very general question whether any of the jurors knew of any reason why they should hot sit in the trial of the case, and thereby precluded himself from urging, in a motion for a new trial, the incompetency of the juror as to any matter which the usual examination would have disclosed. Gregg v. The State, 39 Miss. 570; Brown v. The State, 60 Miss. 447.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Miss. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-miss-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack