Wood v. State

21 Ind. 276
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The information in this case is against John Wood for selling “ one pint of whisky on Sunday.” the information is not good, as a charge of selling less than a quart under the general license law; because, though the defendant is charged with selling one pint, still, if he sold a barrel, be sold a pint, because a pint is contained in a barrel. Struckman v. The State, at this term.

If the information should be held as charging tbe sale of more than a quart, then there is no penalty for making such [277] sale on Sunday. The State v. Thomasson, 19 Ind. 99. The prosecution should have been under a different statute. Sohn v. The State, 18 Ind. 389.

D. E. Palmer, for the appellant. Oscar B. Hord, Attorney General, for the State.

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded to be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 21 Ind. 276 (Ind. 1863).

21 Ind. 276 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arbintrode v. State
67 Ind. 267 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)