Wood v. State
This text of 198 S.E. 799 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of operating and maintaining a lottery, known as the “number game.” As to the method of operation of this lottery see Cutcliff v. State, 51 Ga. App. 41 (179 S. E. 568); Turk v. State, 55 Ga. App. 732 (191 S. E. 283). The evidence showing the defendant’s flight from the officers at a speed of eighty miles per hour around two o’clock, p. m., when taken in connection with certain incriminatory statements made by the defendant when apprehended, tended strongly to show, if it did not conclusively show, his possession or guilty connection [413]*413with certain lottery tickets found near the road and about three hundred yards from the point of his apprehension, the-majority of which were dated that day. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find the defendant guilty as charged. The general grounds being the only points argued in the brief of counsel for the defendant, it follows that under the above ruling the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.E. 799, 58 Ga. App. 412, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-gactapp-1938.