Wood v. State
Opinion
A verdict of guilty of selling liquor was demanded by the evidence, which showed that two persons registered at a hotel as guests, and were shown to their room by the defendant—a porter,—• and when they entered the room he was asked if he could get for them some whisky; that he said he would see what he could do for them; and that in a few minutes he came back with a pint-bottle, which contained about a half pint of corn liquor, for which they paid him $1.50. The fact that ho never solicited the guests to buy from him, but that the first suggestion as to the whisky came from them, could not avail him as a defense.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
126 S.E. 885 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.