Wood v. State

126 S.E. 885, 33 Ga. App. 551, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wood v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Ga. App. 58
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1925·No. 16064·Published

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

A verdict of guilty of selling liquor was demanded by the evidence, which showed that two persons registered at a hotel as guests, and were shown to their room by the defendant—a porter,—• and when they entered the room he was asked if he could get for them some whisky; that he said he would see what he could do for them; and that in a few minutes he came back with a pint-bottle, which contained about a half pint of corn liquor, for which they paid him $1.50. The fact that ho never solicited the guests to buy from him, but that the first suggestion as to the whisky came from them, could not avail him as a defense.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 126 S.E. 885, 33 Ga. App. 551, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 586 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

126 S.E. 885 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.