Wood v. State

113 S.E. 106, 29 Ga. App. 66, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 58
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1922·No. 13581·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The conviction of the defendant was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J„ and LuJce, J., concur. Hugh E. Combs, Frank H. Colley, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 113 S.E. 106, 29 Ga. App. 66, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 58 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 106 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.