Wood v. State

113 S.E. 106, 29 Ga. App. 66, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 58
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1922
Docket13581
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 106 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. State, 113 S.E. 106, 29 Ga. App. 66, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 58 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The conviction of the defendant was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J„ and LuJce, J., concur. Hugh E. Combs, Frank H. Colley, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 106, 29 Ga. App. 66, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-gactapp-1922.