Wood v. State

827 So. 2d 360, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14301, 2002 WL 31202449
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wood v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 867 So. 2d 590
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2002·No. No. 1D01-3963·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Wood seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity. Wood contends that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law and violated his due process rights by granting the state’s motion to dismiss his appeal without providing him with an opportunity to respond to the motion. We agree and grant the petition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.300 (2000); see, e.g., Marty v. Bainter, 709 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(grant-ing the petition for a writ of certiorari after the circuit court dismissed the petitioner’s appeal without giving him the ten day notice required by Fla. R.App. P. 9.410); Lawson v. State, 654 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The circuit court shall reinstate Wood’s appeal and grant him an opportunity to respond to the state’s motion to dismiss.

ERVIN, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 827 So. 2d 360, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14301, 2002 WL 31202449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

827 So. 2d 360 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marty v. Bainter
709 So. 2d 185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Lawson v. State
654 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)