Wood v. State
This text of 399 So. 2d 108 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant has appealed from the judgment entered upon his nolo contendere plea to second degree murder, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements obtained from him during in-custody interrogation. Pursuant to Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979), appellant has not reserved a legally disposi-tive issue and, therefore, is not entitled to an appeal. Since appellant’s plea was entered well after finality of the Brown decision, his plea is hereby dismissed and appellant need not be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
399 So. 2d 108, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.