Wood v. State

399 So. 2d 108, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1981·No. No. VV-12·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has appealed from the judgment entered upon his nolo contendere plea to second degree murder, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements obtained from him during in-custody interrogation. Pursuant to Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979), appellant has not reserved a legally disposi-tive issue and, therefore, is not entitled to an appeal. Since appellant’s plea was entered well after finality of the Brown decision, his plea is hereby dismissed and appellant need not be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea.

McCORD, BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 399 So. 2d 108, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

399 So. 2d 108 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Plant v. State
407 So. 2d 966 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)