Wood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wood v. State

375 So. 2d 10, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 1979

DocketNo. NN-401

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 375 So. 2d 10 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. State, 375 So. 2d 10, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Wood appealed an order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850. Finding potentially meritorious contentions in the motion, we ordered the State to respond to the appeal and granted leave to supplement the record. We now find after reviewing the record presented that Wood, convicted and sentenced on numerous subsequent offenses, would not be entitled to release from imprisonment even if the consecutive sentence contested in the motion here involved were vacated. Therefore there was no error in denying the motion. Johnson v. State, 184 So.2d 161 (Fla.1966), aff’d on rehearing 185 So.2d 466 (Fla.1966).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wood appealed an order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850. Finding potentially meritorious contentions in the motion, we ordered the State to respond to the appeal and granted leave to supplement the record. We now find after reviewing the record presented that Wood, convicted and sentenced on numerous subsequent offenses, would not be entitled to release from imprisonment even if the consecutive sentence contested in the motion here involved were vacated. Therefore there was no error in denying the motion. Johnson v. State, 184 So.2d 161 (Fla.1966), aff’d on rehearing 185 So.2d 466 (Fla.1966).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 So. 2d 10, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack