Wood v. Simons
This text of 110 Mass. 116 (Wood v. Simons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is governed by Fuller v. Cunningham, 105 Mass. 442, unless it is to be distinguished by the fact that there is no express provision of law requiring the clerk to note, upon the creditor’s statement of claim, the time of filing, as there is in regard to mortgages of personal property and assignments of wages. Gen. Sts. c. 151, § 3. But the provisions of the Gen. Sts. c. 150, § 5, requiring the creditor to file his claim in the office of the town clerk, or giving him the right to do so, impose upon the clerk an official authority and duty to make that filing effectual. His indorsement of a memorandum of the time of receiving and filing the paper is an act in the course of his official duty. When made at the time, and certified by him, if not conclusive in all respects, we think it cannot be impeached by evidence merely that it was made and the paper received by the tlerk at his house instead of his office.
Judgment for the petitioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 Mass. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-simons-mass-1872.