Wood v. Seaver

33 N.E. 587, 158 Mass. 411, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 321
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 4, 1893·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Field, C. J.

The contention of the appellant is that the words, “ All the aforesaid legacies are to them and their heirs,” found at the close of item 17 of the will, mean that the legacies are given to the legatees named in the will if alive at the death of the testatrix; but if not alive at that time, then to their heirs, respectively. “ And ” in a will is sometimes read “ or,” when the context shows that such is the intention of the testator, but there is nothing in the context here which shows that the word has not its customary meaning. In a legacy of personal property to a legatee named and his heirs, the word “ heirs,” although technically appropriate to real estate, is taken to be a word of limitation, and to indicate that the whole interest of the testator in the personal property is given absolutely to the legatee. In the present case, one of the legatees not a child or other relation of the testatrix having died before the testatrix, the legacy lapsed. Pub. Sts. c. 127, § 23. Kimball v. Story, 108 Mass. 382.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Seaver, 33 N.E. 587, 158 Mass. 411, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 321 (Mass. 1893).

33 N.E. 587 (Wood v. Seaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morehouse v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.
75 A.2d 493 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1950)
Gomoll v. Temple
27 P.2d 1018 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Evers v. Williams
29 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 197 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1931)
Rea v. Griffin
21 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 129 (Madison County Court of Common Pleas, 1916)
Stone v. Stone
158 N.W. 340 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
State Street Trust Co. v. Morris
105 N.E. 992 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Galloway v. Darby
151 S.W. 1014 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Farnsworth v. Whiting
66 A. 831 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1906)
Smith v. Rice
66 N.E. 806 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Adams v. Jones
57 N.E. 362 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Frost v. Courtis
45 N.E. 687 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Horton v. Earle
38 N.E. 1135 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Bryson v. Holbrook
34 N.E. 270 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)