Wood v. Ryan

Ninth Circuit

Wood v. Ryan

760 F.3d 919, 2014 WL 3558126, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13782

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 18, 2014·No. 08-99003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution. Because the three-judge panel consisting of Judges Thomas, Gould, and Bybee has jurisdiction over Appeal No. 08-99003 and petitioner’s execution is not “imminent,” the Petition for Writ of Habe- *920 as Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution is referred to the Clerk for determination by the three-judge panel. See Cir. R. 22-2(c) (“Once a case is assigned to a death penalty panel, the panel will handle all matters pertaining to the case.... ”); Cir. R. 22-4(e) (“In all capital cases where petitioner seeks a stay of execution, the Clerk shall refer any motion for a stay of execution to the death penalty panel.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution. Because the three-judge panel consisting of Judges Thomas, Gould, and Bybee has jurisdiction over Appeal No. 08-99003 and petitioner’s execution is not “imminent,” the Petition for Writ of Habe- *920 as Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution is referred to the Clerk for determination by the three-judge panel. See Cir. R. 22-2(c) (“Once a case is assigned to a death penalty panel, the panel will handle all matters pertaining to the case.... ”); Cir. R. 22-4(e) (“In all capital cases where petitioner seeks a stay of execution, the Clerk shall refer any motion for a stay of execution to the death penalty panel.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Wood v. Ryan, 760 F.3d 919, 2014 WL 3558126, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13782 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

760 F.3d 919 (Wood v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related