Wood v. Reynolds
This text of 7 Watts & Serg. 406 (Wood v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is certain that ah initial, standing with a name of baptism, is'no part of it in pleading; but it follows not that an omission of it is to be disregarded as an index of notice to purchasers. Persons of the same name are individuated by various additions ; sometimes by title, profession, residence or seniority ; sometimes by numerals; sometimes by colour of the complexion or hair; and sometimes by ah initial. ThcarbssUbe of the badge, in this instance, misled a purchaser; and though the judgment is good against the defendant, it is bad against the ter re-tenant. It was the plaintiff’s business to see his judgment properly entered; and he must bear the loss caused by his negligence, rather than one who is in no default whatever. Though the terre-tenant was apprized of the defect before he had paid the last shilling, he was bound by his engagement to pay; and actual notice came too late.'
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Watts & Serg. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-reynolds-pa-1844.