Wood v. . Raynor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wood v. . Raynor

129 S.E. 595, 190 N.C. 865, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 214

DecidedOctober 14, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 595 (Wood v. . Raynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. . Raynor, 129 S.E. 595, 190 N.C. 865, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 214 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

The appellant demurred on the ground (1) that two causes of action have been improperly united in the complaint; (2) that the two alleged causes of action are not separately stated; (3) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute either cause of action; (4) that there is a defect of parties defendant; (5) that there is an action pending between Annie E. Fuller and C. G-. Wood over the land in controversy.

In the light of numerous decisions of the Court we think his Honor was correct in overruling the demurrer. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

The appellant demurred on the ground (1) that two causes of action have been improperly united in the complaint; (2) that the two alleged causes of action are not separately stated; (3) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute either cause of action; (4) that there is a defect of parties defendant; (5) that there is an action pending between Annie E. Fuller and C. G-. Wood over the land in controversy.

In the light of numerous decisions of the Court we think his Honor was correct in overruling the demurrer. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.E. 595, 190 N.C. 865, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-raynor-nc-1925.