Wood v. Rasquin

97 F.2d 1023
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1938
Docket299
StatusPublished

This text of 97 F.2d 1023 (Wood v. Rasquin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Rasquin, 97 F.2d 1023 (2d Cir. 1938).

Opinion

97 F.2d 1023 (1938)

Howard O. WOOD, Jr., and Caryl H. Wood, Appellants,
v.
Almon G. RASQUIN, Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellee.

No. 299.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 13, 1938.

Wood, Cooke & Seitz, of New York City (Howard O. Wood, Elliott W. Smith, and Stephen Callaghan, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Harold St. L. O'Dougherty, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., and James W. Morris, Asst. U. S. Atty (Sewall Key and Donald J. Marran, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment, 21 F.Supp. 211, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Rasquin
21 F. Supp. 211 (E.D. New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F.2d 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-rasquin-ca2-1938.