Wood v. Ramond

42 Cal. 643
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
DocketNo. 2,409
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 42 Cal. 643 (Wood v. Ramond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Ramond, 42 Cal. 643 (Cal. 1872).

Opinion

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action under the two hundred and fifty-fourth section of the Practice 0Act, to quiet his title to certain premises. The defendants, after denying most of the material allegations of the complaint, set up [645]*645wliat is claimed as new matter, and upon it demanded affirmative relief. Upon the hearing, the Court, on the defendants’ motion, ordered a judgment of nonsuit. The defendants, thereupon, offered to prove their allegations of new matter. The Court refused them permission to introduce evidence. This is alleged as error, and is the sole ground of the appeal.

A defendant, conceiving that the plaintiff' has failed to prove Ills case, may waive a motion for a nonsuit, and proceed to prove his own case, and have judgment on the merits. But if he move for a nonsuit, and the nonsuit be granted, he cannot proceed and have judgment on the merits; because, by reason of the nonsuit, the plaintiff is virtually out of Court. A nonsuit, granted on the motion of the defendant, is equivalent, in its operation on the action, to a dismissal with the consent of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cullen v. Spremo
298 P.2d 579 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Long v. Superior Court
58 P.2d 952 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Knapp v. B. Nicoll & Co.
296 P. 655 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
City and County of San Francisco v. Brown
96 P. 281 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Guthiel v. Gilmer
76 P. 628 (Utah Supreme Court, 1904)
Davenport v. Dose
67 P. 112 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1902)
Ordway v. Boston & Maine Railroad
45 A. 243 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1898)
McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.
31 P. 999 (Montana Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Cal. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-ramond-cal-1872.