Wood v. . Ordway
100 N.E. 1126, 207 N.Y. 661, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1450
This text of 100 N.E. 1126 (Wood v. . Ordway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wood v. . Ordway, 100 N.E. 1126, 207 N.Y. 661, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1450 (N.Y. 1912).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, J., dissents on the ground that the plaintiff’s books were not sufficiently proved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 N.E. 1126, 207 N.Y. 661, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-ordway-ny-1912.