Wood v. Mitchell

17 N.Y.S. 782, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 694, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 512
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 18, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 N.Y.S. 782 (Wood v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Mitchell, 17 N.Y.S. 782, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 694, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 512 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Laavrence, J.

In this case there is nothing which shows that the judgments were not founded upon just and legal debts due from Mitchell to the parties in whose favor the judgments were entered. Under such circumstances, it cannot be held that the action of the respondents’ attorneys in obtaining an extension of time to answer was a fraud upon the plaintiff, entitling him to the relief which he seeks in this action. The opinion of the learned justice who tried the case fully covers it, and it therefore follows that the judgment in the defendants’ favor should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. B. Claflin Co. v. Arnheim
33 N.Y.S. 1037 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 782, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 694, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-mitchell-nysupct-1892.