Wood v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH

329 S.W.3d 399, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1657
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 2010·No. ED 94496·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sheila Wood (hereinafter, “Wood”) appeals the circuit court’s judgment affirming the Missouri Department of Mental Health’s (hereinafter, “DMH”) decision that she committed one count of Class I neglect, 9 CSR 10-5.200(1). Wood raises four points on appeal, challenging the decision that she committed neglect in that DMH failed to: (1) consider evidence there were others who violated the same patient protocol; (2) reference medical definitions or standards; (3) issue its decision within a mandatory time period; and (4) notify Wood of its preliminary determination of neglect within the mandatory time period.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, 329 S.W.3d 399, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1657 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

329 S.W.3d 399 (Wood v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Richmond Heights v. Brooks
329 S.W.3d 399 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)