Wood v. Milyard

Supreme Court

Wood v. Milyard

180 L. Ed. 2d 939, 132 S. Ct. 70, 564 U.S. 1066, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5201, 80 U.S.L.W. 3179

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wood v. Milyard. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 S. Ct. 1826 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 27, 2011·No. No. 10-9995·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-[940]*940peris granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the following questions: (1) Does an appellate court have the authority to raise sua sponte a 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) statute of limitations defense? (2) Does the State’s declaration before the district court that it “will not challenge, but [is] not conceding, the timeliness of Wood’s habeas petition,” amount to a deliberate waiver of any statute of limitations defense the State may have had?

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 335.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-[940]*940peris granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the following questions: (1) Does an appellate court have the authority to raise sua sponte a 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) statute of limitations defense? (2) Does the State’s declaration before the district court that it “will not challenge, but [is] not conceding, the timeliness of Wood’s habeas petition,” amount to a deliberate waiver of any statute of limitations defense the State may have had?

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 335.

Wood v. Milyard, 180 L. Ed. 2d 939, 132 S. Ct. 70, 564 U.S. 1066, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5201, 80 U.S.L.W. 3179 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

180 L. Ed. 2d 939 (Wood v. Milyard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related