Wood v. Milyard
This text of 180 L. Ed. 2d 939 (Wood v. Milyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-[940]*940peris granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the following questions: (1) Does an appellate court have the authority to raise sua sponte a 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) statute of limitations defense? (2) Does the State’s declaration before the district court that it “will not challenge, but [is] not conceding, the timeliness of Wood’s habeas petition,” amount to a deliberate waiver of any statute of limitations defense the State may have had?
Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 335.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 L. Ed. 2d 939, 132 S. Ct. 70, 564 U.S. 1066, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5201, 80 U.S.L.W. 3179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-milyard-scotus-2011.