Wood v. Mehlville Fire Protection District

399 S.W.3d 515, 2013 WL 2304177, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 643
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 2013·No. No. ED 99065·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mehlville Fire Protection District (“Employer”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) finding James Wood (“Claimant”) qualified for unemployment benefits. The Commission determined that Employer had failed to provide evidence that the drug test of Claimant was performed, recorded, or reported in accordance with 49 C.F.R., Part 40 as required by Section 288.045.6, RSMo 2000.1 Employer argues it satisfied every relevant provision of Section 288.045.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error of law. The Commission’s determination was supported by sufficient competent evidence and was not procured by fraud. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Mehlville Fire Protection District, 399 S.W.3d 515, 2013 WL 2304177, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

399 S.W.3d 515 (Wood v. Mehlville Fire Protection District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.