Wood v. . Marsh

1 N.C. 716
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 716 (Wood v. . Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. . Marsh, 1 N.C. 716 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinions

1. It does not appear of what estate the Dean and Chapter were seized, for they may be seized pur auter vie and then the life of the cestui quevie ought to be alleged. And although as it is given to an aggregate body, it may be understood to be a fee; yet the plea shall be taken more strongly against the pleader.

CURIA. CREW, C. J., DODERIDGE and JONES, JJ. Granted that an avowry is like an action and a declaration. But There is a difference between an aggregate and a single corporation. But this not now in the case of a purchase, but in pleadings. If he had said that I. S. being seized in fee, gave it to the Dean and Chapter, and they were seized, perhaps it would have been understood to be a fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-marsh-kingsbench-1793.