Wood v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wood v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co.

113 N.Y.S. 3

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 113 N.Y.S. 3 (Wood v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co., 113 N.Y.S. 3 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinions

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiffs sue to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant. The defendant was the agent of the plaintiffs to collect certain accounts due to the plaintiffs. The evidence presented only a question of fact as to whether the defendant was negligent. The defendant proved the efforts which it made to collect the accounts, and in regard to some of the accounts it offered evidence to show that it would be difficult or impossible to establish that the goods for which the accounts had been rendered were delivered. Upon the whole case, the trial justice was justified in finding for the defendant. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

GIEDERSLEEVE, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiffs sue to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant. The defendant was the agent of the plaintiffs to collect certain accounts due to the plaintiffs. The evidence presented only a question of fact as to whether the defendant was negligent. The defendant proved the efforts which it made to collect the accounts, and in regard to some of the accounts it offered evidence to show that it would be difficult or impossible to establish that the goods for which the accounts had been rendered were delivered. Upon the whole case, the trial justice was justified in finding for the defendant. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

GIEDERSLEEVE, P. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 N.Y.S. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-manufacturers-commercial-co-nyappterm-1908.