Wood v. Lovett
This text of 1 Pennyp. 51 (Wood v. Lovett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sum claimed as shown by the transcript was within the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. We discover no error in admitting in evidence the several letters which passed between the parties. They were sufficient to justify the jury in finding the defendant in error did accept the proposition made by the plaintiff in error to deliver the shingles, and a sufficient consideration to support the agreement. Failing and refusing to deliver them, he became liable to pay the money. The jury having passed [55]*55upon the merits of the case, we discover no such variance between the pleadings and the evidence as to require a reversal of the j udgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Pennyp. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-lovett-pa-1881.