Wood v. Ledgerwood

Fifth Circuit

Wood v. Ledgerwood

210 F. 163, 127 C.C.A. 13, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1898

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 1, 1913

DocketNo. 2,497

StatusPublished

This text of 210 F. 163 (Wood v. Ledgerwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Ledgerwood, 210 F. 163, 127 C.C.A. 13, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1898 (5th Cir. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The note upon which the debt sought to be proved is founded is barred upon-its face by the Texas statute of limitations of four years. The extensions relied upon to toll the statute having been made subsequent to the time the debt became due, and not being in writing and signed by the bankrupt, are not effective. See article 3370, R. S. Texas 1895; article 5705, R. S. Texas 1911.

The ruling of the court below rejecting the proof of debt was correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The note upon which the debt sought to be proved is founded is barred upon-its face by the Texas statute of limitations of four years. The extensions relied upon to toll the statute having been made subsequent to the time the debt became due, and not being in writing and signed by the bankrupt, are not effective. See article 3370, R. S. Texas 1895; article 5705, R. S. Texas 1911.

The ruling of the court below rejecting the proof of debt was correct.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 F. 163, 127 C.C.A. 13, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-ledgerwood-ca5-1913.