Wood v. Leach

540 P.2d 1084, 189 Colo. 361, 1975 Colo. LEXIS 827
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 22, 1975
Docket26773
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 540 P.2d 1084 (Wood v. Leach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Leach, 540 P.2d 1084, 189 Colo. 361, 1975 Colo. LEXIS 827 (Colo. 1975).

Opinion

Opinion by

MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON.

The sufficiency of extradition documents supplied by the State of California is the only issue on appeal. The complaint and the affidavits which establish probable cause are sufficient. The Governor properly or *362 dered that the defendant be extradited, and we, therefore, affirm.

The extradition documents met all requirements set out in the Uniform Extradition Act. Section 16-19-104, C.R.S. 1973. Wood was arrested in Colorado after the issuance of a Colorado governor’s warrant on October 25, 1974. He petitioned and obtained a writ of habeas corpus.

The demand for extradition was accompanied by an amended criminal complaint bearing the date of September 11, 1974. An arrest warrant dated July 11, 1974, which was based on a previous complaint for the same offense, was also enclosed. Finally, three affidavits were submitted to establish probable cause and to support extradition, but all bore the date of September 27, 1974. Wood contends that the trial court erred in discharging the writ of habeas corpus because the affidavits all postdate the complaint and warrant. We disagree.

Whether the affidavits establishing probable cause were executed before or after the charging document is immaterial, provided that the extradition documents, viewed in their entirety, establish probable cause that the person to be extradited committed the offense. See Ex parte Edwards, 502 S.W.2d 148 (Tex.Crim.App. 1973); cf., Pippin v. Leach, 188 Colo. 385, 534 P.2d 1193 (1975); People v. McFall, 175 Colo. 151, 486 P.2d 6 (1971); see also Kirkland v. Preston, 385 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Accordingly, we affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HODGES, MR. JUSTICE KELLEY, and MR. JUSTICE LEE concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunn v. Hindman
836 F. Supp. 750 (D. Kansas, 1993)
Dietz v. Leach
607 P.2d 993 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1980)
Moore v. Miller
596 P.2d 64 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1979)
Hill v. Miller
578 P.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1978)
People v. Pitcher
557 P.2d 395 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 P.2d 1084, 189 Colo. 361, 1975 Colo. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-leach-colo-1975.