Wood v. Holden

45 Me. 374
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1858·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Tenney, C. J.

The parties, in legal form, “ agreed to submit the demand with the cause of action set forth in the writ, hereto annexed, to,” &c. The action is trespass, and the writ makes a part of the case. The claim is shown clearly by the declaration in the writ, and the words upon the back thereof, “from the office of Yirgin & Dunnell,” is a sufficient signing of the claim in behalf of the plaintiff. R. S. of 1841, c. 138, § § 2 and 4. Exceptions overruled.

Hathaway, Cutting, May, Goodenow, and Davis, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Holden, 45 Me. 374 (Me. 1858).

45 Me. 374 (Wood v. Holden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.