Wood v. Harper

56 So. 10, 1 Ala. App. 422, 1911 Ala. App. LEXIS 270
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 So. 10 (Wood v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Harper, 56 So. 10, 1 Ala. App. 422, 1911 Ala. App. LEXIS 270 (Ala. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The complaint contained what purported to be counts in trover, trespass, and case; and while perhaps some of them are defective in averments and subject to demurrer, yet no demurrer was interposed.

The defendant filed what he styled a plea in abatement to the entire complaint, and to which a general demurrer was sustained by the court. If there was error in sustaining a general demurrer it was manifestly error without injury, as it affirmatively appears that the defendant on the trial had the benefit of everything set up as a defense in the said plea.

The certificate offered in evidence by the defendant, and to which an objection by the plaintiff was sustained, is not set out in the bill of exceptions, and we are [424]*424therefore unable to say whether the trial court erred in its ruling on plaintiff’s objection or not.

The bill of exceptions, which purports to set out all of the evidence, fails to show that the recorded judgment of the justice of the peace mentioned in the evidence was recorded within 90 days of its rendition under the special act approved March 1, 1901 (Acts 1900-01, p. 1355), relating to Randolph county, and unless it was so recorded it created no lien.

The evidence, without conflict, showed that the plaintiff was the owner of the horse in question at the time of the levy of the defendant’s execution on his judgment in the justice court against one Burke, and hence a wrongful taking. This justified the giving of the general charge in favor of the plaintiff on the count in trespass.

No error appearing of record the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Note. — The foregoing opinion was prepared by Mr. Chief Justice Dowdell, of the Supreme Court, before the transfer of the case to this court, and was adopted by this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Kennedy
195 So. 2d 820 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1966)
Neumiller v. Jenkins
117 So. 2d 402 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Harris v. Raughton
73 So. 2d 921 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 So. 10, 1 Ala. App. 422, 1911 Ala. App. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-harper-alactapp-1911.