Wood v. Hammond

36 A. 1135, 19 R.I. 398
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 8, 1896·No. Equity, No. 2654.·Published

Opinion

The general rule is that the expenses of determining questions which arise upon a will, occasioned by the testator, *399 shall be borne by the estate and paid out of the general assets. Sawyer v. Baldwin, 20 Pick. 373, 383, 389; Bowditch v. Soltyk, 99 Mass. 136, 141 ; Deane v. Home for Aged Colored Women, 111 Mass. 132, 135; Morse v. Stearns, 131 Mass. 389, 391; Wilson v. Squire, 13 Simons, 212, 213; Attorney General v. Lawes, 8 Hare, 32 ; Charter v. Charter, L. R. 7 H. L. 364.

William G. Roelker, for complainants. Tillinghast, Ely, Douglas, Almy, Woods, Burbank & Gardner, for different respondents.

We are of the opinion, therefore, that the motion of certain of the respondents for a reasonable allowance for counsel fees and expenses incurred in litigating the questions arising on the will should be granted.

We will hear the parties as to the amount of such allowance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Hammond, 36 A. 1135, 19 R.I. 398 (R.I. 1896).

36 A. 1135 (Wood v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowditch v. Soltyk
99 Mass. 136 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Deane v. Home for Aged Colored Women
111 Mass. 132 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1872)
Morse v. Stearns
131 Mass. 389 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)