Wood v. Hacker
121 So. 441, 219 Ala. 139, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 108
Opinion
Under the rule obtaining in such cases we are unable to review the questions of fact presented by the petition for certiorari. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. We may add that the record of the Court of Appeals has been read, and we find in it nothing .to cause regret that the rule of this court in the matter of review by certiorari is as it is.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wood v. Hacker, 121 So. 441, 219 Ala. 139, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 108 (Ala. 1929).
121 So. 441 (Wood v. Hacker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bishop v. State
145 So. 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Terry v. State
148 So. 159 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)