Wood v. Hacker
121 So. 441, 219 Ala. 139, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 108
This text of 121 So. 441 (Wood v. Hacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wood v. Hacker, 121 So. 441, 219 Ala. 139, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 108 (Ala. 1929).
Opinion
Under the rule obtaining in such cases we are unable to review the questions of fact presented by the petition for certiorari. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. We may add that the record of the Court of Appeals has been read, and we find in it nothing .to cause regret that the rule of this court in the matter of review by certiorari is as it is.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bishop v. State
145 So. 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Terry v. State
148 So. 159 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 So. 441, 219 Ala. 139, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-hacker-ala-1929.