Wood v. Furtick

City of New York Municipal Court

Wood v. Furtick

16 Misc. 289, 39 N.Y.S. 173

CourtCity of New York Municipal Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Misc. 289 (Wood v. Furtick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Furtick, 16 Misc. 289, 39 N.Y.S. 173 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s attorney, on behalf of the defendant who desired to have certain levies made under a warrant of attachment granted herein vacated and set aside, made a motion to set aside such levies.

He subscribed said motion papers as follows: “Lawrence Godkin; attorney for defendant and assignee.” In our opinion he having so appeared, it must be said that such appearance without limitation or stating that it was special and for the motion only was general and entitled plaintiff to enter the judgment as was done herein and that the same was duly and regularly entered.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. •

Present: Fitzsimons and O’Dwybr, JJ,

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI