Wood v. Forbes
62 Cal. 37, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 692
This text of 62 Cal. 37 (Wood v. Forbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wood v. Forbes, 62 Cal. 37, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 692 (Cal. 1882).
Opinion
The motion to dismiss the appeal must prevail. If it be admitted that affidavits can be considered which tend to show a verbal stipulation to extend the time to file the transcript, there are in this case affidavits more numerous and pointed to the effect that no such stipulation was made.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stewart v. Smith
91 P. 667 (California Court of Appeal, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 Cal. 37, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-forbes-cal-1882.