Wood v. Food Emporium, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wood v. Food Emporium, Inc.

267 A.D.2d 380, 700 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 380 (Wood v. Food Emporium, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Food Emporium, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 380, 700 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered June 21, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon lack of notice of a dangerous condition, the defendant is required to make a prima facie showing af[381]*381firmatively establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law (see, Beltran v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 259 AD2d 456; Dwoskin v Burger King Corp., 249 AD2d 358; Ostuni v East Rockaway Vil. Tavern, 238 AD2d 558; Gordon v Waldbaum, Inc., 231 AD2d 673, 674). The defendant failed to make the required showing, and the Supreme Court properly denied its motion. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered June 21, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon lack of notice of a dangerous condition, the defendant is required to make a prima facie showing af[381]*381firmatively establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law (see, Beltran v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 259 AD2d 456; Dwoskin v Burger King Corp., 249 AD2d 358; Ostuni v East Rockaway Vil. Tavern, 238 AD2d 558; Gordon v Waldbaum, Inc., 231 AD2d 673, 674). The defendant failed to make the required showing, and the Supreme Court properly denied its motion. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 380, 700 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-food-emporium-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack