Wood v. Fiske

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Wood v. Fiske

62 N.H. 173

DecidedJune 5, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 173 (Wood v. Fiske) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Fiske, 62 N.H. 173 (N.H. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Allen, J.

The evidence of Richardson’s declarations, made while he was in possession of the land, as to the location of a boundary, was competent to rebut the defendant’s evidence of the plaintiff’s constant recognition of the boundary claimed by the defendant, and would have been competent as affirmative evidence of his own boundaries. South Hampton v. Fowler, 54 N. H. 197, and cases cited on page 200.

Report recommitted.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen, J.

The evidence of Richardson’s declarations, made while he was in possession of the land, as to the location of a boundary, was competent to rebut the defendant’s evidence of the plaintiff’s constant recognition of the boundary claimed by the defendant, and would have been competent as affirmative evidence of his own boundaries. South Hampton v. Fowler, 54 N. H. 197, and cases cited on page 200.

Report recommitted.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-fiske-nh-1882.