Wood v. Estes

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Wood v. Estes

33 Me. 578

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedJuly 1, 1851

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Me. 578 (Wood v. Estes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Estes, 33 Me. 578 (Me. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

Shepley, C. J.

— The appeal brings up the disclosures for adjudication here.

Stewart moves that the case be dismissed, for the alleged reason, that the sureties in the appeal-recognizance are insufficient.

The recognizance was taken before a justice of the peace, under [579]*579zhe general Act of Amendment of 1841, by which ten days may be allowed for the taking of a recognizance in that mode.

Per Curiam. — The judgment of the justice as to the sufficiency <of the sureties is final. The motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shepley, C. J.

— The appeal brings up the disclosures for adjudication here.

Stewart moves that the case be dismissed, for the alleged reason, that the sureties in the appeal-recognizance are insufficient.

The recognizance was taken before a justice of the peace, under [579]*579zhe general Act of Amendment of 1841, by which ten days may be allowed for the taking of a recognizance in that mode.

Per Curiam. — The judgment of the justice as to the sufficiency <of the sureties is final. The motion is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Me. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-estes-me-1851.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack