Wood v. Estes

33 Me. 578
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Shepley, C. J.

— The appeal brings up the disclosures for adjudication here.

Stewart moves that the case be dismissed, for the alleged reason, that the sureties in the appeal-recognizance are insufficient.

The recognizance was taken before a justice of the peace, under [579]*579zhe general Act of Amendment of 1841, by which ten days may be allowed for the taking of a recognizance in that mode.

Per Curiam. — The judgment of the justice as to the sufficiency <of the sureties is final. The motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Estes, 33 Me. 578 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 578 (Wood v. Estes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tinley v. Frederick
11 A.2d 329 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1940)