Wood v. Dic/Underhill and Universal Builders Supply Co.
365 A.2d 723, 144 N.J. Super. 364
Opinion
MARK WOOD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DIC/UNDERHILL AND UNIVERSAL BUILDERS SUPPLY CO. ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LORA, CRANE and ARD.
Mr. Henry J. Williams argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Seaman, Williams and Seaman, attorneys).
Mr. Francis X. Garrity argued the cause for respondent, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Messrs. Bergamino and De Gonge, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Bilder reported at 136 N.J. Super. 249 (Law Div. 1975).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wood v. Dic/Underhill and Universal Builders Supply Co., 365 A.2d 723, 144 N.J. Super. 364 (N.J. Ct. App. 1976).
365 A.2d 723 (Wood v. Dic/Underhill and Universal Builders Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Del Bosco v. United States Ski Ass'n
839 F. Supp. 1470 (D. Colorado, 1993)
Williams v. National Car Rental System, Inc.
541 A.2d 1125 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Walker v. Stephens
626 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1982)