Wood v. Dic/Underhill and Universal Builders Supply Co.
This text of 365 A.2d 723 (Wood v. Dic/Underhill and Universal Builders Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MARK WOOD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DIC/UNDERHILL AND UNIVERSAL BUILDERS SUPPLY CO. ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LORA, CRANE and ARD.
Mr. Henry J. Williams argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Seaman, Williams and Seaman, attorneys).
Mr. Francis X. Garrity argued the cause for respondent, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Messrs. Bergamino and De Gonge, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Bilder reported at 136 N.J. Super. 249 (Law Div. 1975).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 A.2d 723, 144 N.J. Super. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-dicunderhill-and-universal-builders-supply-co-njsuperctappdiv-1976.