Wood v. Derrickson

1 Hilt. 410
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedAugust 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Hilt. 410 (Wood v. Derrickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Derrickson, 1 Hilt. 410 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1857).

Opinion

INGRAHAM, First Judge. —

There is no ground upon wbicb this appeal can be sustained.

The action was upon an undertaking given on appeal, and was conditioned for tbe payment, of all costs and damages wbicb might be awarded on appeal, and of tbe judgment of affirmance. It did not require tbe issuing an execution, but was forfeited as soon as tbe affirmance of the judgment took place, and tbe debtor made default in its payment.

Tbe answer merely sets up that tbe defendant was tbe owner of real estate, and tbe execution issued was returned by tbe sheriff before tbe expiration of sixty days, at tbe plaintiff’s request, without attempting to make tbe money out of tbe real estate.

This formed no defence to tbe action. It did not relieve tbe defendants from their liability previously incurred. It may be [411]*411that the surety might have required the creditor to issue an execution and levy on the real estate; but, without such a request, he cannot complain that the creditor has not pursued his remedy further against his debtor than the issue of an execution.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sterne v. Talbott
35 N.Y.S. 412 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hilt. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-derrickson-nyctcompl-1857.