Wood v. Davis
1 Va. 90
This text of 1 Va. 90 (Wood v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wood v. Davis, 1 Va. 90 (Va. Ct. App. 1792).
Opinion
It is not necessary that the time ap[91]*91pointed for the delivery of the property should be stated to be that at which the sale is to take place. The law does not require it, nor can it produce any benefit whatever to the obligors, that it should be so stated.
Judgment affirmed.
Irvin v. Eldridge, Burnside v. Court, post.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Va. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-davis-vactapp-1792.