Wood v. Crowner
This text of 4 Hill & Den. 548 (Wood v. Crowner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The affidavit should have been made by the plaintiff, or a sufficient excuse given for the omission. The motion must be denied.
Ordered accordingly,
As to affidavits on which to move for or oppose a change of venue, see the note to Brittan v. Peabody, (ante, p. 64, pl. 4; p. 69, pl. 9.) And see Bird and others v. Moore and others, (3 Hill, 447,) as to affidavits on which to move for judgment as in case of non-suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Hill & Den. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-crowner-nycterr-1843.