Wood v. Courtney

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Wood v. Courtney

937 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 2006 WL 668714

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 17, 2006

Docket2040017

StatusPublished

This text of 937 So. 2d 1064 (Wood v. Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Courtney, 937 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 2006 WL 668714 (Ala. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court.

THOMPSON, Judge.

On June 10, 2005, this court affirmed the trial court’s order insofar as it granted a motion for a new trial as to the claims asserted by Tara Wilbur and Terry Wilbur; this court reversed the trial court’s [1065]*1065order insofar as it granted a motion for a new trial as to the claims asserted by Dana Haines Courtney. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court to the extent that it reversed the trial court’s order granting the motion for a new trial as it pertained to Courtney. Ex parte Courtney, 937 So.2d 1060 (Ala.2006). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and PITTMAN, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court.

THOMPSON, Judge.

On June 10, 2005, this court affirmed the trial court’s order insofar as it granted a motion for a new trial as to the claims asserted by Tara Wilbur and Terry Wilbur; this court reversed the trial court’s [1065]*1065order insofar as it granted a motion for a new trial as to the claims asserted by Dana Haines Courtney. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court to the extent that it reversed the trial court’s order granting the motion for a new trial as it pertained to Courtney. Ex parte Courtney, 937 So.2d 1060 (Ala.2006). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and PITTMAN, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

937 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 2006 WL 668714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-courtney-alacivapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack