Wood v. Courtney

937 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 2006 WL 668714
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wood v. Courtney. Read the opinion of the Court — 937 So. 2d 1052
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 17, 2006·No. 2040017·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court.

THOMPSON, Judge.

On June 10, 2005, this court affirmed the trial court’s order insofar as it granted a motion for a new trial as to the claims asserted by Tara Wilbur and Terry Wilbur; this court reversed the trial court’s [1065]*1065order insofar as it granted a motion for a new trial as to the claims asserted by Dana Haines Courtney. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court to the extent that it reversed the trial court’s order granting the motion for a new trial as it pertained to Courtney. Ex parte Courtney, 937 So.2d 1060 (Ala.2006). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and PITTMAN, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Courtney, 937 So. 2d 1064, 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 2006 WL 668714 (Ala. Ct. App. 2006).

937 So. 2d 1064 (Wood v. Courtney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Courtney
937 So. 2d 1060 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)